The Benda v Hamer question ….

Please only use this forum to discuss football related matters. Non football related posts will be removed to the correct forum. Please respect your fellow posters at all times and refrain as much as possible from the use of bad language.
User avatar

Topic author
Itchysphincter
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 1957
Joined: 27 Jun 2020 17:12

The Benda v Hamer question ….

Unread post by Itchysphincter »

…. has been answered.

Benda 100% of the time.

FACT.

Trouble is Martin can’t bring him back now without admitting he dropped him rather than ‘rotated’ him. Poor shout that was from the manager. Put it right and settle on a first choice 11.


jack123 wrote:
06 Dec 2020 21:08
:lol: :lol: :lol: You should seek therapy, with thoughts like you have.. Dr P is the best thing since sliced bread.

User avatar

dickythorpe
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 2073
Joined: 22 Jul 2020 22:05

Re: The Benda v Hamer question ….

Unread post by dickythorpe »

Well we haven't lost today so maybe he gets another shot🤣😂



User avatar

Topic author
Itchysphincter
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 1957
Joined: 27 Jun 2020 17:12

Re: The Benda v Hamer question ….

Unread post by Itchysphincter »

dickythorpe wrote:
18 Sep 2021 17:04
Well we haven't lost today so maybe he gets another shot🤣😂
He’s not terrible by any stretch but he’s certainly no better than Benda. It was his first test today since Hull and Millwall offered the grand total of one shot between them, and he didn’t exactly come out of it looking particularly good.

It has to be Benda being as Hamer is not an upgrade.


jack123 wrote:
06 Dec 2020 21:08
:lol: :lol: :lol: You should seek therapy, with thoughts like you have.. Dr P is the best thing since sliced bread.

User avatar

Nocountryforoldjack
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1021
Joined: 30 Jun 2020 10:44

Re: The Benda v Hamer question ….

Unread post by Nocountryforoldjack »

Bender all day long.. Hamer is gash




bakajack
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 531
Joined: 29 Jun 2020 12:27

Re: The Benda v Hamer question ….

Unread post by bakajack »

Hamer today was such a liability that Luton realised they could press us and get change out of it almost every single time. That time in the 2nd half where he dribbled past the striker almost gave me an aneurism.

I would prefer to stick with Benda and give him the experience to grow properly into the keeper he clearly has the potential to be once he takes his punches and learns from them.




old cob
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 139
Joined: 27 Jun 2020 16:56

Re: The Benda v Hamer question ….

Unread post by old cob »

Not a lot to choose between the two keepers IMO, but Benda will improve with games. Hamer has reached, and gone past his peak I'm afraid.
Last edited by old cob on 18 Sep 2021 18:02, edited 2 times in total.




cmajack
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 175
Joined: 28 Jun 2020 19:54

Re: The Benda v Hamer question ….

Unread post by cmajack »

In truth, neither are good enough to be playing at this level on the evidence I've seen so far this season.



User avatar

PSumbler
Site Admin
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 3430
Joined: 06 Jul 2020 14:40

Re: The Benda v Hamer question ….

Unread post by PSumbler »

cmajack wrote:
18 Sep 2021 19:33
In truth, neither are good enough to be playing at this level on the evidence I've seen so far this season.
What he said


Been running this place since 2001, still gives me a headache now!

User avatar

Topic author
Itchysphincter
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 1957
Joined: 27 Jun 2020 17:12

Re: The Benda v Hamer question ….

Unread post by Itchysphincter »

PSumbler wrote:
18 Sep 2021 20:58
cmajack wrote:
18 Sep 2021 19:33
In truth, neither are good enough to be playing at this level on the evidence I've seen so far this season.
What he said
Can’t agree. Benda looks a different beast to me, capable of being a top, top keeper.


jack123 wrote:
06 Dec 2020 21:08
:lol: :lol: :lol: You should seek therapy, with thoughts like you have.. Dr P is the best thing since sliced bread.

User avatar

PSumbler
Site Admin
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 3430
Joined: 06 Jul 2020 14:40

Re: The Benda v Hamer question ….

Unread post by PSumbler »

Itchysphincter wrote:
18 Sep 2021 21:10
PSumbler wrote:
18 Sep 2021 20:58


What he said
Can’t agree. Benda looks a different beast to me, capable of being a top, top keeper.
Not sure I see it but will happily be wrong

JUst so Badlands doesnt think it will be used to abuse our feckless shareholders!


Been running this place since 2001, still gives me a headache now!

User avatar

dickythorpe
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 2073
Joined: 22 Jul 2020 22:05

Re: The Benda v Hamer question ….

Unread post by dickythorpe »

Itchysphincter wrote:
18 Sep 2021 21:10
PSumbler wrote:
18 Sep 2021 20:58


What he said
Can’t agree. Benda looks a different beast to me, capable of being a top, top keeper.
Needs better feet....which is ironic as a goalkeeper should really be all about hands




Badlands
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 974
Joined: 30 Jun 2020 13:13

Re: The Benda v Hamer question ….

Unread post by Badlands »

TBF Hamer didn't have much of a chance with any of their goals.
Both decent enough at this level and overall both an upgrade on Woodman.
Freddy dropped by Newcastle and not on the bench ... should be getting experience at lower levels,
Last edited by Badlands on 18 Sep 2021 22:09, edited 1 time in total.



User avatar

Topic author
Itchysphincter
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 1957
Joined: 27 Jun 2020 17:12

Re: The Benda v Hamer question ….

Unread post by Itchysphincter »

PSumbler wrote:
18 Sep 2021 21:20
Itchysphincter wrote:
18 Sep 2021 21:10


Can’t agree. Benda looks a different beast to me, capable of being a top, top keeper.
Not sure I see it but will happily be wrong

JUst so Badlands doesnt think it will be used to abuse our feckless shareholders!
I’m no expert but I don’t see the problem with his keeping, I’ve been impressed by his instinct, distribution and composure. The problem has been his decision making with the ball at his feet but even that hasn’t been too bad when you consider the decision making if the other ten out there.
These users thanked the author Itchysphincter for the post:
Badlands


jack123 wrote:
06 Dec 2020 21:08
:lol: :lol: :lol: You should seek therapy, with thoughts like you have.. Dr P is the best thing since sliced bread.

User avatar

Longlostjack
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1143
Joined: 27 Jun 2020 21:43
Location: Bratwurst and Beer Land

Re: The Benda v Hamer question ….

Unread post by Longlostjack »

Badlands wrote:
18 Sep 2021 22:04
TBF Hamer didn't have much of a chance with any of their goals.
Both decent enough at this level and overall both an upgrade on Woodman.
Freddy dropped by Newcastle and not on the bench ... should be getting experience at lower levels,
The third goal he was indecisive, letting ball cross him. It was his corner and he should have cut it out.
These users thanked the author Longlostjack for the post:
JackSomething



User avatar

JackSomething
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1051
Joined: 19 Jul 2020 00:20

Re: The Benda v Hamer question ….

Unread post by JackSomething »

Badlands wrote:
18 Sep 2021 22:04
TBF Hamer didn't have much of a chance with any of their goals.
Both decent enough at this level and overall both an upgrade on Woodman.
Freddy dropped by Newcastle and not on the bench ... should be getting experience at lower levels,
I mostly agree on Hamer with the possible exception of the third. He started to come out and then just followed the ball across goal, leaving himself out of position for the shot. I think he was disappointed in himself if his reaction was anything to go by.

As for Woodman, he's just had 2 seasons as first choice for a team that's finished in the top 6 of the Championship both seasons. If he's not ready for a lower half PL team like Newcastle after that, it may just be that he's never going to be. Plenty of time to prove everyone wrong of course.

Edit: Missed Longlostjack's post above. What he said.
Last edited by JackSomething on 18 Sep 2021 23:18, edited 1 time in total.



Post Reply